Friday, February 26, 2010

Mock The Week




The standard BBC comedy show gets a six week run, but there has been a trend to, where possible, film five episodes, then close the series out with a compilation/out-takes episode. It’s cheap and it’s lazy, but sometimes it’s funny enough to be worth while. This week Mock the Week closed out their current series with a clip show.

 

For those unfamiliar the show, Mock the Week is a British panel game based on improvised topical stand-up comedy. It’s hosted by Ireland’s Dara O’Briain who is joined by 3 regular panelists (Hugh Dennis, Any Parsons and Russell Howard) and 3 guest comedians.

 

Although this series has been good, it hasn’t been as good as previous years due to the departure of Frankie Boyle as a regular. The other regulars are all pretty middle class. Boyle brought a working class I-don’t-give-a-shit kind of attitude that provided at least one jaw on the floor moment of anti-political correctness hilarity per week. All this compilation does is highlight that the show is severely lacking in edge since the departure of Boyle.

 

The geusts rarely stepped up to fill the gap left by Boyle. Patrick Kielty was the first in the scotsman’s seat and came across as turgidly broad, saying nothing controversial. Instead of attempting stinging ploitical satire like the other comedians, he made Ant and Dec jokes. The BBC must love him.

 

The BBC has been very fond of safe comedians since Sachsgate and two of their current darlings, John Bishop and Chris Addison, also made appearences without really saying anything properly funny. It was just humourous.

 

One of things that really grated about this “best of” episode is that it didn’t really reflect the series. Edinborough award winner, Sarah Milican was pretty dissapointing over the course of her 30 minute appearance. When that appearance was condenced down to a few clips she seemed bloody hilarious.

 

Milican got more screen time than the minority acts who appeared during the series. Andrew Maxwell, Andi Osho and Holly Walsh barely got a look in. If you’re Ireish or black or young you were slightly overlooked.

 

Milton Jones stole the show the two times he appeared this year with his obscure one-liners. None of these made it in, instead his only real inclusion was an off the cuff remark about a short policeman being nicknamed “Piglet”.

 

The regulars obviously had the best clips. Russell Howard tells an annecdote about how his catted batted his balls when he’d gotten out of the shower one day and Andy Parsons compares sex addict clinics to Weight Watchers meetings where everyone else is a cake.

 

All of the satire and improv was however blown out of the water by outtakes of Dara O’Briain shooting the panelists with a little Nerf gun. He then shoots a little foam ball up in the air and tries to catch it in his mouth. The first two attempts fail but the third time is the charm, and this somehow brought the biggest smile to my face. Bring back Boyle.

 

 

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Tower Block Of Commons

Embedding disabled
you can watch HERE
 

The idea of Tower Block Of Commons is that four MPs leave behind their comfie homes and lives for eight days and nights to live in council tower blocks and estates in some of Britain's most deprived neighbourhoods. In doing so they come face-to-face with issues including gang life, immigration, drug addiction, poverty, crime and unemployment. One would imagine that the point is to give the MPs an insight into the lives of the people that they would otherwise not interact with. It’s one thing to hear stories of poverty. It’s quite another to experience them.

 

The eight days the MPs spent on the estates were broken up in four stints in which they would spend two days with a different family (more often than not sleeping on a sofa). This week was the third episode so by now the politicians had acquainted themselves with their surroundings. Iain Duncan Smith was probably the biggest name attached to the series but he left on the first day after receiving news that his wife had developed cancer.

 

So we were left with:

 

Liberal Democrat Mark Oaten who was sent to Goresbrook Village in Barking. Mark has the most selacious backstory of all the MPs. He was touted as a potential leader of the Lib Dems until he got caught in a car with some male prostitutes. His first day on the estate saw some youths pass remarks about rent boys as Mark passed them in a corridor. A few minutes later Oaten was lying face-down on a nearby green having a bit of a cry while his host sat in her flat having a fag.

 

When Oaten had finished feeling sorry for himself he noticed the flats were incredibly run down. His host who told him there was a lapsed campaign to get the flats knocked down and the area redeveloped. Oaten took this task on and began to revive the campaign.

 

The second episode saw Oaten organize a meeting about the redevelopment and clash with his hosts. Mark didn’t like his host spending £40 of her family’s shopping budget on smokes. She didn’t like Oaten’s involvement in the recent expenses scandal. They agreed to disagree.

 

This week Mark started putting up posters informing locals about the meeting, which council promptly took down. He then starts flyering post boxes. Initially only 30 people turn up but when more arrive they relocate to the local pub. Mark sees his job as organising, not running because he knows he’ll be leaving. Things get a bit dramatic when a local councillor from the BNP turns up. This doesn’t go down well with residents and it all turns into a shouting match until the councillor leaves.

 

The next day the police turn up in numbers at the flats because an argument between 2 families has caused major turbulance. It happens about 3 times a month apperently.

Mark talks to the local kids like they’re middle calss, even going so far as to call one of them “poppit”. He hugs one young girl but I had to ask myself would he do that if there was no camera?

 

Mark’s host for the two days of this episode are Mark and Alan, a gay couple, married for 2 years, living in a flood damaged flat. They don’t bring friends over apparently. We don’t see much of the lads. Either something incredibly controversial happened, absolutely nothing controversial happened, or Oaten barely saw them because he was too caught up with his campaign. In any case there was no mention of rent boys or Oaten’s wife and two kids.

 

The prostitution scandal has been mentioned during the series but its absense from this particular episode raises questions about Oaten’s character. Also his involvement in the expenses row was a little bit glossed over.

 

Oaten pulls back a lot of credibilty by being honest at the end of this episode though, when he looks straight into the camera and says “I couldn’t live here”. Honesty is the best policy.

 


Conservative Tim Loughton is a bit more media savvy when engaging with the gang-divided Newtown estate in Birmingham, and throws himself into the area with a more confidence. He did have an easier ride initially. His first night was spent babysitting for a young single mother. His second was spent at a rave with said single mother. Nothing too taxing there.

 

The second set of housemates for the shadow children’s minister was family of four living in a one bedroom flat. Loughton’s biggest task is having a heart to heart (in front of the camera) with the father of the family after finding a hash pipe, eventually reducing his host to tears.

 

This week was a tad harsher. Tim met his new landlord, 43 year old Adrian, who lives in constant fear since having knife pulled on him, and keeps a stick in every room. Loughton sees his oppurtunity to show off his passion for poor folks to the camera and seizes it with gusto. He talks to a family who’s son was shot dead, then a former gang member who now works for community anti-gang group. Its’s hard to get gang members to talk to camera but Tim’s previous interviewee sorts it. Loughton talks to gang member who tells him that loayalty is all important and that people are violent because  that’s “just the way people are actin’ nowadays”, before calling for activities for young people. It’s never explained if the interviews were set up by Tim or the production company. It all just comes across as documentary being made by Loughton, as opposed to about him.

 

The next day he goes looking for activities for local young people and finds only a football pitch behind fence, with no access for kids from the block. He is then brought  to center where a recording studio is apparently available to kids from the surrounding area and makes an awful attempt at rapping before declaring rap “a piece of piss”.

 

Loughton puts himself around and talks to more residents than any of the other MPs. You can ask the question: is he a) Engaging with residents of council estates and getting an understanding of how these places work? or, b) Posturing for the cameras? The answer will not be televised.

 

Conservative Nadine Dorries was drafted in to replace Iain Duncan Smith in the second week. She set about endearing herself to her host family by cooking dinner and it all looked to be going very well until she sneakily pulled a £50 note out of her bra when going to bed (the MPs were supposed to hand over their money and mobiles). This proved the preconception held by the hosts that MPs are all underhanded. Dorries claims the money was for the children of the family but only when confronted. Everything gets kind of smoothed over and she leaves after her two-day stint on vaguely positive terms.

 

In this week’s episode she shacks up with 69 year old widow, Ruth, who is unhappy with a Somalian Mosque that has opened across the road from her house. The Mosque used to be a veterens center that she and her husband wold frequent. Nadine meets the leader of Mosque (Khalid) who tells her that he and his people cleared junkies out of the building after it had fallen into disrepair. Nadine picks up a sense of racial tension in the area and sets up BBQ (would it be politically incorrect to suggest that only a woman would suggest a party to quash racial tensions? Somebody get a giant grill to the West Bank).

 

The next day Khalid is unhappy with Nadine from previous day’s interview, and tells her that he was very hurt and nearly in tears. Nadine realises that if one side doesn’t turn up then she’s made things worse by ramping up tensions. The BBQ goes well but not brilliant, around seven or eight non-muslim residents (out of a few hundred) turn up but the producers make it look like a big success. At least Khalid and Ruth have a chat, and organise a bbq for next week.

 

The biggest character of all the MPs comes in the form of Labour backbencher Austin Mitchel who is sent to Hull. Mitchel does his best to undermine the stereotype of Labour being the party of the people by refusing to play by the rules. He insisted having his own flat and having his wife live with him and never really engaged with the purpose of the show – MPs experiencing the hardships of council estate life. The first night saw Mitchel leave the estate he was delegated by the producers to go to a dinner party.

 

The next day Austin was shocked to realise that his guide (as opposed to his host) revealed herself to be on a methadone scheme. Austin couldn’t comprehend why she turned to drugs and tries to play it off with bad jokes and poor singing. He has a similar reaction when wife reveals that she was once addicted to perscription drugs (a fact of which he was unaware).

 

His second set of guides were a family living on welfare who piss Austin off by quizzing him on the prices of day to day comodities. They then leave him to mind the kids. He very quickly realises that he’s out of his depth and calls for his wife to come save him. This man thinks he should have been Prime Minister.

 

Austin’s third guide is an employee at a youth center which is shut down during his time with her. He spends time with the kids in the center and joins them for a spot of community service but doesn’t really engage with them. He tries to help by pulling some strings with the local media but he gives the impression that he won’t investigate how many of these centers he can help once the eight days are over. He just seems to want to survive the whole experience and doesn’t act as if he’s learning anything.

 

Mitchel has called the producers of the show bastards in a very bitter statement on his website. He seems to think that the producers were out to make all the MPs look bad but if you don’t play by the rules you can’t expect a free ride. He seemed to think he was going to get deified just for turning up.

 

The concept of MPs spending time in the opposite extreme of the society they’ve created is a great one. Every public representative should be forced to spend a week in the company of the people who don’t have a secure family to guide them through life. These are the people who need the government more than anyone. The problem is the cameras. The MPs act up and this as a campaign tool.

 

This shouldn’t be a TV show, it should be political policy (innit).

 

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Newswipe

British journalist, comic writer, broadcaster, kermudgen and all around ledge Charlie Brooker has been providing you with satirical giggles out of the spotlight of the mainstream since around the year 2000. He was writer on such classics as the Eleven O’Clock show and Brass Eye’s controversial paedophile special.

 

In 2006, the BBC gave him his own little show on BBC4 called Screenwipe, in which he gave viewers a snidey, synical and hilarious insight into how TV programmes are put together combined with commentary on trends and fads in TV land.

 

In 2009, Brooker spun Screenwipe off into Newswipe, a show of a similar format but incorporating newspaper coverage. Brooker has become a John Stewart for this side of the atlantic, taking poor journalism to task for failing the public and slamming politicians for exploiting the media, all the while drawing sniggers from the viewing public.

 

Each week begins with a Charlie’s analysis of a major news event from the week. The show cuts between clips of news coverage and Brooker sat on his sofa making snarky remarks. This sounds potentially awful, but Brooker’s charm and wit carry it off. 

 

This week’s big news story in Britain was the Chilcot inquiry and Brooker uses the Iraq tribunal to vent his spleen on all things political: the huge gulf in behaviour between politicians and ordinary people, the media’s fascination with ex-Prime Ministers (particularly the dull minutia of there lives), news organisations attempts to pre-empt what would be said during the inquiry and the law stopping Newswipe from showing any clips from the inquiry due to a law preventing broadcasters from using footage of the event for the purposes of satire or entertainment.

 

Brooker then tears apart a film made by Richard Maedely for the Daily Politics on BBC2, in which the former daytime TV presenter defends the actions of Tony Blair.

 

Then there is a brief history lesson that shows how TV has gone from pandering to politicians to being aggressive and eventually invasive with them.

 

It’s not all about Charlie though each week there his slot allocated for a geust theorist, academic, comedian or broadcaster. This week’s Newswipe featured a six and a half minute film by Adam Cutis, the man behind The Century of the Self. Curtis outlines how the Watergate scandal has led to an overenthusiasm in investigative journalism causing paranoia against the government which stimulated neo liberalism in the 1980s. This tendency towards overzealousness in journalistic fraternaties has driven the news to look for controversy where it does not exist, creating false epidemics as with swine flu, bird flu and BSE. As a result we are all paranoid and sceptical.

 

Another regular slot is the Week in Bullshit in which Brooker highlights exmples of overcoverage of non-news. This week he slams coverage of the Toyota’s recall and Jordan’s wedding.

 

This week also saw a piece by regular contributor, American comedian Doug Stanhope. Doug points out that media coverage rarely focuses on the contribution of overpopulation to global warming. Stanhope delivers his message through an angry white white trash alcohlic persona but his message is pure intellectualism. He points to an academic study that shows that a woman multiplies her carbon footprint by 40 times just by popping out a couple of sprogs. This of course is not the sort of thing other media outlets would tell you.

 

The main diference between this year’s Newswipe and last year’s Newswipe is the audience. Screenwipe and Newswipe have been popular among critics and media types but the show never really drew much outside attention due to its position on BBC4. The last year however has seen Charlie Brooker break out and become something of a minor celebrity. Brooker’s work with Channel 4 hasn’t hurt. He presented You Have Been watching at 10.30 on Tuesdays during the Summer and was a featured in the Big Fat Quiz of the Year alongside the likes of Russell Brand, Jonathon Ross and Jimmy Carr at Christmas. Twitter has helped too. Chuck has slipped snuggly into the London Twitteratti circuit since joining the social networking site, and has picked up a fairly large following. The international pulling power of Twitter has even seen the Huffington Post champion Newswipe.

 

With a growing national celebrity and international acclaim beginning to surround this show it can’t be too long before the beeb decides to bring Newswipe in from the digital wilderness. Don’t be surprised if the next series of wipes appear on BBC1.

 

That’s what I’ve been watching this week, now go away.

Saturday, February 6, 2010

Lost

Lost returned to our screens this week in typical what in the name of Jaysis is going on style.

 

RTE were generous enough to give an hour long retrospective of the first five series. Five series of bunkum and conundrums in one hour.

 

Large chunks of the story were missing and at least half of the significant characters were completely ignored. Anna Lucia, Mr Eko, Boone, Shannon, Rose, Bernard, Vincent, Libby, Michael, Walt, Penny and many others didn’t get a look in.

 

In all fairness, you’d need a week long recap if wanted to give any first time viewers a sporting chance of understanding what’s going on. It was just a very broad run through the backstory.

 

The recap posed questions that I don’t think the writers considered. How did Juliet learn to be a mechanic? How easy was it to convince Jack to go back to the island ? Locke just knew his Dad’s name - that’s what obituaries are for. How did Clare get onto a plane when she was 8 months pregnant? I thought  that was illegal. How chubby Jack in the first episode?

 

And that’s just the questions they didn’t want you to think about. Try factoring in all the puzzles that they want to pose.

 

This last series is strictly for those who’ve been suckered in for the last few years. Maybe you came in in the first series, maybe the second – but that’s the brink of fashionable tardiness. Don’t bother turning up to the party now.

 

After the recap we began the new season with a double episode.

 

We start with a flashback to the plane aaaaand... NO! Rose was in the tail end. She couldn’t have been sat next to Jack!!! And Sawyer’s hair is long again!! And Hurley’s facial hair is thick again!! They don’t know what they’re doing!

 

These were the first things that struck me. How could a show based on creating and solving mysteries in its viewers’ heads mess up basic continuity. This left me very very worried.

 

I managed to put these worries to the back of my head and get back into my usual state of optimism that the writers knew what they were doing. I switched my brain to the slow cycle and made the following obsevations: Kate still looks hot even after a nuclear explosion. They got rid of that 1977 bollix quick enough. The actor who plays Boone is back, no Shannon though. She’s was one of the main reasons I got into the first season. Sayid’s wounds are the first time Jack hasn’t bother trying to surgery someone back to life.

 

Reviews from the States had suggested that this first episode would be short on answers but there was one big one. The Smoke monster is the man in black who was doesn’t like Jacob. The guy in black also exposed himself as the new John Locke (with the original John Locke being more dead than I would have liked). This was a major answer in my book and filled the explaining stuff quota in one big swoop.

 

Of course, it does lead to the further questions of who is this dude and what was his beef with Jacob? Other questions that presented themselves over the course of the double episode were: What did Juliet mean by “It worked”? Why does Jin have all that money? When did Sun peak hotnesswise? I don’t think it was too long ago. If the bomb trick worked, why are they on the island aswell? Is Sayid dead or what?

 

A good few people died in this episode so that means that their stories don’t need to be resolved, but several also returned from the dead so don’t surprised if some them pop back up further down the line.

 

So we’re two hours into the last season and there are still a bunch of questions that don’t look like they will be resolved. How did the others get there? Why can’t women have kids on the island? Where’s Claire? What’s the deal with Christian? What’s the deal with Jacob? What’s that big statue about? Is it an island or something else? Why do people keep believing Ben?

 

I don’t really care about most of those things though. There’s only one answer I’m looking for. Who is Kate going to pick?