Sunday, April 11, 2010

Comedy Roast: Chris Tarrant

This week Channel 4 ran a trilogy of comedy roasts in which a well known celebrity would sit on a stage while comedians and friends ripped as much piss out of them as is humanly possible without causing death by dehydration.

 

The subject of the final roast of the trilogy was Chris Tarrant, who began broadcasting as host of saturady morning kids’ show TISWAS and went on to host Capital FM’s breakfast show for 17 years as well as many TV gameshows, including Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?

 

Jimmy Carr has hosted all three roasts and started this one by insulting chris’s home town of reading and worked his way through tarrant’s studies, pre-broadcast carreer as a teacher, first footsteps into broadcasting and marital problems.

 

Sean Lock was then stepped up to the podium. Lock essentially called Tarrant boring and pretty talentless. He ran throught the extensive list of quiz shows Tarrant hosted and makes up a few really tedious ones to point how how ludicrous some of the shows the man hosted over the years were.

 

Jamie Theakston was next up. His sepeech wasn’t particularly funny but when he slipped up reading the autocue the laughs started flowing. Chris interupted him and read the end of his speech for him.

 

Sally James, Chris’s TISWAS co-presenter, followed Jamie with quite a dull bit of banter. The two were like an unfunny aunt and uncle trying to show off at a party. She listed off the injuries Tarrant suffered during his time as kids TV host. ‘Twasn’t very funny.

 

Sir Terry Wogan didn’t attend the night but he prerecorded a wee speech in which he tries to find nice things to say but only manages to call him tall and often drunk. Killer delivery from a legendary broadcaster.

 

Peter Kay’s sometime sidekick and probable heir to Chris Tarant’s throne as host of any gammy new quiz show, Paddy McGuiness then did a Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? spoof with multiple choice questions. Very funny for a complete chancer.

 

Jack Dee kermudgened his way to the podium next. He starts by having a go at tarrant’s hawaiian shirts, then goes through all of the other little things that annoy him about the roastee from his goofy chuckle to the pauses he takes on Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?

 

A short spoof film about Bob Carrolgees was then shown. Bob and his puppet dog talk about how he feels abandoned by Chris from his candle shop.

 

Jack Whitehall followed this by talking about Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? and how Chris has made loads and loads of money from the show and compared the scandal when a contestant cheated to win the million and Chris cheating on his wife.

 

Mark Durden Smith who is Judith Chalmers’ son and family friend of Chris then stood up. He’s no stand up though and he seemed to think cursing a lot would be funny. He was wrong.

 

The penulitmate speech came from Mark Watson and he showed a clip from Tarrant’s cheesy dating show Man Oh Man. He reads out the offensively brief wikipedia entry about Chris’s Colour of Money game show.


The final speech came from the man himself and he began by pretending to have a big ego and calling for his own knighthood. He then acted as if he didn’t know that he was going to be ridiculed. He then reminds the audience that Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? was the biggest quiz show in the world and uses McGuiness as a link to an annecdote about Peter Kay only winning £500 on the show. He doesn’t take on any of the proper comedians on in is response but does give Durden Smith, Theakston and Sally James a backhander each. His delivery is clunky and hammy, but hey he had some good lines and took the whole thing in good spirit.

 Click here to watch the roast on YouTube

Sunday, April 4, 2010

Have I Got News For You

BBC One

Thursdays, 8.30pm

Have I Got News For You returned for its fifty gagilionth series this week. It’s still the BBC’s archetypal comedy-news quiz, with one host asking questions on all things newsworthy, while improv comedian, Paul Merton and Private Eye editor, Ian Hislop try to answer them in as funny a way as possible with the aid of one guest panelist each.

 

Hislop was paternered with 22 year old Scottish stand up, Kevin Bridges, while Merton had Nigel Farage of UKIP for company. UKIP being the UK Independence Party, a party who according to their website are a “Libertarian, non-racist party seeking Britain's withdrawal from the European Union”. If you feel the need to put “non-racist” in on your website, you’ve probably justifiably earned a reputation for being racist.

 

Lee Mack occupied the guest host’s chair, which has still not found a new owner since Angus Deayton was fired for doing naughty things in 2002.

 

The quiz consisted of three rounds. The first round sees videos involving the week’s biggest news stories with no audio being shown to each team, who have to guess what the story is. Obviously both teams got the answer correct, but this isn’t a very hotly contested competitition. It’s more an excuse to take the piss out of any political figures who have strayed into the press in the time between episodes. This week Tony Blair got it in the neck for giving a speech in support of Gordon Brown’s election campaign and five MPs got hammered for accepting money from companies in exchange for changing little laws that prevent them making money.

 

The second round was the picture spin quiz, which is focussed on the less publicised, more ridiculous stories in the news. This week a Hollywood-style sign for Basildon, health and safety measures preventing the Queen from walking down some stairs because she “had not been trained to use them”, the laughter of hiennas and a sign in Romania warning motorists of drunks in the road were mulled over. Here’s hoping it continues through the whole series.

 

Finally a very brief missing words round where contestants had are shown a sentence from a publication and have to guess a word which has been blacked out gave a Merton and Mack the chance to exchange a few improvised one-liners. Bridges tried to join in but he was outclassed by the senior comedians.

 

Bridges didn’t say much throughout the episode. He’s had a few telly appearences this year, but seemed to let the nerves get the better of him here. He did bang out one corker though, when he pointed out that a Tory billboard with the words “I let 80,000 criminals out early, vote for me” next to picture of Gordon Brown actually secured ol’ Brownie 80,000 votes.

 

Farage was a complete joke, and not in a good way. Merton, Hislop and Mack tore him to shreds with ease because of his party’s policies. All he could do was sit there chuckle along as he got called ignorant. He may have thought appearing on the show would make him look as if he wasn’t stuffy and had a sense of humour, but he wound up looking like a gormless gimp who thought taking a beating was funny. In the end he wound up making UKIP look even more out of touch with everyday Brittons. At one point he admitted to being a crooked politician, expecting the audience to laugh. They didn’t.

 

This series could be a little different to previous years. Normally the producers force the panelists to go quite soft on Labour, but with the upcoming election, they know there is a strong chance that the reds will soon be out of power, so took the oppurtunity to go for the jugular. Of course the Tories got as much of a battering. David Cameron’s hint that he may cut the licence fee may have caused the BBC to be fearful enough to take the kid gloves off with Labour, but he’s still a dick and Merton and Hislop seemed to relish the freedom to take everybody down a peg. The Lib Dems and UKIP got spanked aswell, so it was all very fair.

Sunday, March 28, 2010

QI

BBC One
Fridays 8.30pm

Viewers of the first episode of QI will know that the Q stands for quite, and the I denotes interesting. The previous sentence is an example of pointless trivia, and pointless trivia is the core theme of QI.

 

Stephen Fry, who is seemingly an expert on everything, poses questions - each episode has a theme that the trivia revolves loosely around - and a panel of four comedians/journalists/professional-personality-types fumble around their memory banks for answers.

 

There is a twist though. All of the questions have a fake answer and a real answer. The fake answer is a common belief that has come to be understood by most people as the truth. Say the fake answer and you loose points. Say the real answer, or just anything distinctly interesting, to gain points.

 

QI is currently in its sixth series and this week perennial panelist, Alan Davies was joined by Jeremy Clarkson, Danny Baker and Bill Bailey to ponder the theme of being ecological.

 

They cover everything green from the original colour of Frankenstein’s monster (which was yellow and not green, as most people think), to the amount of gold contained in mobile phones, to the fact that wind turbines cause bats (but not birds) to fall out of the sky.

 

Along the way the panel take the conversation on detours, with Bill Bailey imagining turning his pet tortoise into a cold blooded remote control car and Danny Baker regailing everyone with a tale of how his car was once smothered by cows.

 

Predictably enough in quiz on ecology, Jeremy Clarkson comes last, but he does point out the set design of QI, which involves Fry being flanked by two panelists and one big screen on each side, is waste of energy. As a result Bill and Alan relocate to Jeremy and Danny’s side of the set so one of the screens can be switched off, thereby saving electricity.

 

The show is built on the charm and wit of Stephen Fry. He could be absolutely wrong about everything, but his delivery of knowledge is so confident that you would believe him if he told you that your parents were badgers.

 

Most pub chats revolve around the X-factor or Eastenders or some other pointless bollocks. QI plays like the type of chat you want to have down the pub. Sophisticated, witty and clever. If only Stephen Fry and the other writers would take up residence in my local.



Thursday, March 18, 2010

Republic of Telly


RTE Two
10.25pm Mondays

Republic of Telly is a vehicle show for Irish stand up, Neil Delamere. Essentially what happens is Neil rips the piss out of a bunch of RTE’s shows. Sometimes he ventures into the UK’s TV guide, but only when RTE’s two stations fail to provide him with enough ammo. The whole thing is essentially Harry Hill’s TV Burp with an Irish accent and a few non-telly related segements with reporters.

 

The show begins with Neil taking a few clips from the likes of Desperate Housewives and Grey’s Anatomy out of context and making little quips about them. Then he zeros in on Operation Transformation, Gerry Ryan’s weight loss reality show. Naturally the review begins with Neil pointing out that auld Gerry isn’t exactly Kate Moss, then he lamps into Ryan for suggesting that the show has some how magically begun to fix the national weight problem.


Then Neil is superimposed into the Oscars Ceremony alongside Alec Baldwin. Baldwin’s opening duolog wasn’t funny when Steve Martin did it with him. Delamere didn’t improve the situation.

 

Neil then takes on an appearance by Trevor Sergent on some show and a BBC documentary about hospitals This is a chance to do what he’s really good at; political satire. He fires off a few barbs that would’ve been more at home on the Panel than on a TV review programme. Unfortuneately RTE has handed the job of satire over to Kevin Myers and Mario Rosenstock  – neither is particularly funny but Mario can do a decent impression of Keith from Boyzone.

 

Soon afterwards Mairead Farrell of Ray D’Arcy's radio show is rolled out to add some glamour. The producers sent her down to Croke park for the Ireland v Wales rugby match to vox pop the crowd. This has nothing to do with television but it was funny watching a load of drunk people talking into a microphone. Got a bit odd when some of the vox poppers started groping Mz Farrell. She was clearly uncomfortable.

 

Then Bernard O’Shea is plopped in front of a green screen to give his survival guide to St.Patrick’s day. Again, this has nothing to do with tele, but hey, Bernie’s supressed rage schtick is funny.

 

After that, red carpet correspondent, Jennifer Maguire gets shipped off to the VIP style awards, the very tenuous link here being that there were some people off the tele at it. She tries some Dennis Pennis/Olivia Lee style cheeckiness. Sometimes it works, as with Marty Whelan who riffs with her a bit. Sometimes it doesn’t, as when Grainne Seoige just calls her mean for insulting “talent” of All Ireland Talent Show.

 

Then there’s some bashing of Fregal Quinn’s Retail Therapy where Fergal Quinn revamps some little shop on the northside or something. I’d started to lose interest at this stage as had much of the audience. Everytime the director cut to them they were gently smiling or applauding, but the big laughs stopped around the time Bernard O’Shea finished.

 

Then there was some gnattering with Mairead on subjects that had nothing to do with TV. They might want to revise the name.

 

The show closes with the TV highlight of the week (and possibly the decade), Crystal Swing’s appearance on the Late Late Show. Neil makes a few jokes about their performance but nothing he says could possibly be funnier than the visuals.

 

A hit and miss episode from a hit and miss series. 

Sunday, March 14, 2010

The Bubble

BBC2, Fridays @ 10pm

 The Bubble is a comedy-news quiz where three celebrities go into a house with no connection to the outside world for four days. When they emerge they are whisked to a studio where David Mitchell shows them a series of outlandish news stories, some real and some fake, and they have to geuss which ones really happened and which ones are a load of old codswhollop.

 

The BBC kind of shot the producers in the foot by banning its news editorial staff from contributing to the show. Sky and ITN ironically have allowed their journalists to be involved.

 

The idea the creators are pushing here is that the real news has become so ludicrous that you couldn’t make up more ridiculous stories if you tried. And they have a point. Amongst the true stories this week were reports of a town in Germany selling potholes, a man who married a pillow, a chef selling cheese made of breast milk and an opera based on the life of Anna Nicole Smith 

 

Of course the Bubble has a very creative writing staff and they did manage to come up with dwarf bowling (bowling with little people as the pins), David Frost falling asleep on live TV and Banskey being outed as the alter ego of Neil Buchanan from Art Attack.

 

These kinds of shows depend heavily on the ability of their guests to create some laughs. Previous weeks have seen Reginald D Hunter, Ed Byrne and Jon Richardson all bringing the giggles. This week Marcus Brigstocke, Sue Perkins and Julia Hartley-Brewer got bubble wrapped, and that line-up resulted in the least funny show of the series. Unlike in previous weeks, none of them are just funny for a living.

 

Brigstocke is a comedian AND environmentalist, Perkins is comedian AND historian and Hartley-Brewer isn’t even a comedian, she’s a newspaper columnist. The worst part is that Hartley-Brewer got more laughs than the two comics. Add to this the fact that they all middle class, college educated white people and you get an episode that represents the problem with the BBC’s comedy since Sachsgate – everybody is safe. Nobody there has the potential to say anything controversial.

 

Each week there are a few clips of the time the contestants spent in the bubble (it’s a big fancy house in the country). Most weeks there are arguments about scrabble and X-box and fun trivial things. All they did this week was have a civilised discussion about climate change. Somebody throw something!

 

Despite the dullness of the guests, the episode was still pretty funny thanks, in the main, to the stories being mocked. If you’re into news based comedy this should fit snuggly into the gap between Have I Got News For You and Mock The Week in the BBC’s annual schedule.

 

 

Sunday, March 7, 2010

Great unanswered questions with Colin Murphy

(I couldn't find any clips from the show on YouTube so I went with a video of Colin Murphy drunkenly chasing some pigeons)

Great unanswered questions with Colin Murphy began life on BBC Radio Ulster before making the leap to the small screen. As the title suggests the show is presented by Belfast’s Colin Murphy. The premise of the show is that Colin tackles pointless, silly, existential questions with the aid of “Doctor of everything” David Booth, who has an uncanny ability to spout facts and figures off the top of his head, and Matthew Collins, who shows bits and bobs he finds on the internet to the audience via a big screen. The trio are also joined by celebrity guest and this week Celebrity Mastermind winner, Lucy Proter filled that role.

 

The first unanswered question to be ununanswered comes from a geordie girl via a vox-pop who asked why hearing running water when you need to pee makes you need to pee even more. Nobody bothers answering the question, they instead talk talk about how attractive she is. This would be sexist if wasn’t for the fact that is was unspeakably good looking and was wearing a funny hat.

 

Next up is an Australian man’s question, via the vox-pop again, who asked why don’t kangeroos and emus walk backwards. Matthew Collins unconvincingly repeats the claim that neither beast can moonwalk before being told to “hold up” by David Booth, who begs to differ. Apparently kangeroos can’t walk backwards but emus can. Booth then stars explaining why Skippy can’t walk backwards until Murphy and Porter go off on a tangent about kangeroos at a party with an awkward situation. The kangeroo party gets interupted by Matthew displaying a video of two roos having a fight.

 

This leads into an annecdote from Murphy who talks aout how kangeroos like to lounge around in quite a human fashion in the parks of Melbourne, then somehow  the subject of kaneroos’ penises is raised and Davey has a whopper of fact to drop on this subject too; apperntly kangeroos have forked penises. This leads to more questions that Booth has no answer for. Matthew digs him out of his void of knowledge by declaring “kualas have it too”.

 

After a smidgen more schoolboy humour the conversation returns to the vox-pop where somebody asks does eating loads of oranges turn your skin orange. Booth goes through the science of the theory and concludes that it will work but you would need to eat a lot of oranges. Carrots work better though, as proved by Matthew who whips up a website that shows a girl who went on a 4-week carrot diet with visible results. This inevitably leads to the revelation that ginger people have a mutant skin pigment.

 

The final ponderance comes directly from the brain of Colin Murphy; why is that boys and old men can’t dance but young men can. David gives a scientific answer involving testosterone levels and body symetery. Matthew throws up a picture of an old man having a whale of a time on a dancefloor and a 5-year old tearing it up on Dance Dance Revelation.

 

Essentially the dynamic is that of a chat in the pub with your brainy mate (Booth) with the added dynamic of a big screen showing funny videos from youtube. It isn’t the most uproariously funny show on the tele (although a stronger a guest could put it closer), but at no point is it less than interesting. Well worth your time.

Friday, February 26, 2010

Mock The Week




The standard BBC comedy show gets a six week run, but there has been a trend to, where possible, film five episodes, then close the series out with a compilation/out-takes episode. It’s cheap and it’s lazy, but sometimes it’s funny enough to be worth while. This week Mock the Week closed out their current series with a clip show.

 

For those unfamiliar the show, Mock the Week is a British panel game based on improvised topical stand-up comedy. It’s hosted by Ireland’s Dara O’Briain who is joined by 3 regular panelists (Hugh Dennis, Any Parsons and Russell Howard) and 3 guest comedians.

 

Although this series has been good, it hasn’t been as good as previous years due to the departure of Frankie Boyle as a regular. The other regulars are all pretty middle class. Boyle brought a working class I-don’t-give-a-shit kind of attitude that provided at least one jaw on the floor moment of anti-political correctness hilarity per week. All this compilation does is highlight that the show is severely lacking in edge since the departure of Boyle.

 

The geusts rarely stepped up to fill the gap left by Boyle. Patrick Kielty was the first in the scotsman’s seat and came across as turgidly broad, saying nothing controversial. Instead of attempting stinging ploitical satire like the other comedians, he made Ant and Dec jokes. The BBC must love him.

 

The BBC has been very fond of safe comedians since Sachsgate and two of their current darlings, John Bishop and Chris Addison, also made appearences without really saying anything properly funny. It was just humourous.

 

One of things that really grated about this “best of” episode is that it didn’t really reflect the series. Edinborough award winner, Sarah Milican was pretty dissapointing over the course of her 30 minute appearance. When that appearance was condenced down to a few clips she seemed bloody hilarious.

 

Milican got more screen time than the minority acts who appeared during the series. Andrew Maxwell, Andi Osho and Holly Walsh barely got a look in. If you’re Ireish or black or young you were slightly overlooked.

 

Milton Jones stole the show the two times he appeared this year with his obscure one-liners. None of these made it in, instead his only real inclusion was an off the cuff remark about a short policeman being nicknamed “Piglet”.

 

The regulars obviously had the best clips. Russell Howard tells an annecdote about how his catted batted his balls when he’d gotten out of the shower one day and Andy Parsons compares sex addict clinics to Weight Watchers meetings where everyone else is a cake.

 

All of the satire and improv was however blown out of the water by outtakes of Dara O’Briain shooting the panelists with a little Nerf gun. He then shoots a little foam ball up in the air and tries to catch it in his mouth. The first two attempts fail but the third time is the charm, and this somehow brought the biggest smile to my face. Bring back Boyle.

 

 

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Tower Block Of Commons

Embedding disabled
you can watch HERE
 

The idea of Tower Block Of Commons is that four MPs leave behind their comfie homes and lives for eight days and nights to live in council tower blocks and estates in some of Britain's most deprived neighbourhoods. In doing so they come face-to-face with issues including gang life, immigration, drug addiction, poverty, crime and unemployment. One would imagine that the point is to give the MPs an insight into the lives of the people that they would otherwise not interact with. It’s one thing to hear stories of poverty. It’s quite another to experience them.

 

The eight days the MPs spent on the estates were broken up in four stints in which they would spend two days with a different family (more often than not sleeping on a sofa). This week was the third episode so by now the politicians had acquainted themselves with their surroundings. Iain Duncan Smith was probably the biggest name attached to the series but he left on the first day after receiving news that his wife had developed cancer.

 

So we were left with:

 

Liberal Democrat Mark Oaten who was sent to Goresbrook Village in Barking. Mark has the most selacious backstory of all the MPs. He was touted as a potential leader of the Lib Dems until he got caught in a car with some male prostitutes. His first day on the estate saw some youths pass remarks about rent boys as Mark passed them in a corridor. A few minutes later Oaten was lying face-down on a nearby green having a bit of a cry while his host sat in her flat having a fag.

 

When Oaten had finished feeling sorry for himself he noticed the flats were incredibly run down. His host who told him there was a lapsed campaign to get the flats knocked down and the area redeveloped. Oaten took this task on and began to revive the campaign.

 

The second episode saw Oaten organize a meeting about the redevelopment and clash with his hosts. Mark didn’t like his host spending £40 of her family’s shopping budget on smokes. She didn’t like Oaten’s involvement in the recent expenses scandal. They agreed to disagree.

 

This week Mark started putting up posters informing locals about the meeting, which council promptly took down. He then starts flyering post boxes. Initially only 30 people turn up but when more arrive they relocate to the local pub. Mark sees his job as organising, not running because he knows he’ll be leaving. Things get a bit dramatic when a local councillor from the BNP turns up. This doesn’t go down well with residents and it all turns into a shouting match until the councillor leaves.

 

The next day the police turn up in numbers at the flats because an argument between 2 families has caused major turbulance. It happens about 3 times a month apperently.

Mark talks to the local kids like they’re middle calss, even going so far as to call one of them “poppit”. He hugs one young girl but I had to ask myself would he do that if there was no camera?

 

Mark’s host for the two days of this episode are Mark and Alan, a gay couple, married for 2 years, living in a flood damaged flat. They don’t bring friends over apparently. We don’t see much of the lads. Either something incredibly controversial happened, absolutely nothing controversial happened, or Oaten barely saw them because he was too caught up with his campaign. In any case there was no mention of rent boys or Oaten’s wife and two kids.

 

The prostitution scandal has been mentioned during the series but its absense from this particular episode raises questions about Oaten’s character. Also his involvement in the expenses row was a little bit glossed over.

 

Oaten pulls back a lot of credibilty by being honest at the end of this episode though, when he looks straight into the camera and says “I couldn’t live here”. Honesty is the best policy.

 


Conservative Tim Loughton is a bit more media savvy when engaging with the gang-divided Newtown estate in Birmingham, and throws himself into the area with a more confidence. He did have an easier ride initially. His first night was spent babysitting for a young single mother. His second was spent at a rave with said single mother. Nothing too taxing there.

 

The second set of housemates for the shadow children’s minister was family of four living in a one bedroom flat. Loughton’s biggest task is having a heart to heart (in front of the camera) with the father of the family after finding a hash pipe, eventually reducing his host to tears.

 

This week was a tad harsher. Tim met his new landlord, 43 year old Adrian, who lives in constant fear since having knife pulled on him, and keeps a stick in every room. Loughton sees his oppurtunity to show off his passion for poor folks to the camera and seizes it with gusto. He talks to a family who’s son was shot dead, then a former gang member who now works for community anti-gang group. Its’s hard to get gang members to talk to camera but Tim’s previous interviewee sorts it. Loughton talks to gang member who tells him that loayalty is all important and that people are violent because  that’s “just the way people are actin’ nowadays”, before calling for activities for young people. It’s never explained if the interviews were set up by Tim or the production company. It all just comes across as documentary being made by Loughton, as opposed to about him.

 

The next day he goes looking for activities for local young people and finds only a football pitch behind fence, with no access for kids from the block. He is then brought  to center where a recording studio is apparently available to kids from the surrounding area and makes an awful attempt at rapping before declaring rap “a piece of piss”.

 

Loughton puts himself around and talks to more residents than any of the other MPs. You can ask the question: is he a) Engaging with residents of council estates and getting an understanding of how these places work? or, b) Posturing for the cameras? The answer will not be televised.

 

Conservative Nadine Dorries was drafted in to replace Iain Duncan Smith in the second week. She set about endearing herself to her host family by cooking dinner and it all looked to be going very well until she sneakily pulled a £50 note out of her bra when going to bed (the MPs were supposed to hand over their money and mobiles). This proved the preconception held by the hosts that MPs are all underhanded. Dorries claims the money was for the children of the family but only when confronted. Everything gets kind of smoothed over and she leaves after her two-day stint on vaguely positive terms.

 

In this week’s episode she shacks up with 69 year old widow, Ruth, who is unhappy with a Somalian Mosque that has opened across the road from her house. The Mosque used to be a veterens center that she and her husband wold frequent. Nadine meets the leader of Mosque (Khalid) who tells her that he and his people cleared junkies out of the building after it had fallen into disrepair. Nadine picks up a sense of racial tension in the area and sets up BBQ (would it be politically incorrect to suggest that only a woman would suggest a party to quash racial tensions? Somebody get a giant grill to the West Bank).

 

The next day Khalid is unhappy with Nadine from previous day’s interview, and tells her that he was very hurt and nearly in tears. Nadine realises that if one side doesn’t turn up then she’s made things worse by ramping up tensions. The BBQ goes well but not brilliant, around seven or eight non-muslim residents (out of a few hundred) turn up but the producers make it look like a big success. At least Khalid and Ruth have a chat, and organise a bbq for next week.

 

The biggest character of all the MPs comes in the form of Labour backbencher Austin Mitchel who is sent to Hull. Mitchel does his best to undermine the stereotype of Labour being the party of the people by refusing to play by the rules. He insisted having his own flat and having his wife live with him and never really engaged with the purpose of the show – MPs experiencing the hardships of council estate life. The first night saw Mitchel leave the estate he was delegated by the producers to go to a dinner party.

 

The next day Austin was shocked to realise that his guide (as opposed to his host) revealed herself to be on a methadone scheme. Austin couldn’t comprehend why she turned to drugs and tries to play it off with bad jokes and poor singing. He has a similar reaction when wife reveals that she was once addicted to perscription drugs (a fact of which he was unaware).

 

His second set of guides were a family living on welfare who piss Austin off by quizzing him on the prices of day to day comodities. They then leave him to mind the kids. He very quickly realises that he’s out of his depth and calls for his wife to come save him. This man thinks he should have been Prime Minister.

 

Austin’s third guide is an employee at a youth center which is shut down during his time with her. He spends time with the kids in the center and joins them for a spot of community service but doesn’t really engage with them. He tries to help by pulling some strings with the local media but he gives the impression that he won’t investigate how many of these centers he can help once the eight days are over. He just seems to want to survive the whole experience and doesn’t act as if he’s learning anything.

 

Mitchel has called the producers of the show bastards in a very bitter statement on his website. He seems to think that the producers were out to make all the MPs look bad but if you don’t play by the rules you can’t expect a free ride. He seemed to think he was going to get deified just for turning up.

 

The concept of MPs spending time in the opposite extreme of the society they’ve created is a great one. Every public representative should be forced to spend a week in the company of the people who don’t have a secure family to guide them through life. These are the people who need the government more than anyone. The problem is the cameras. The MPs act up and this as a campaign tool.

 

This shouldn’t be a TV show, it should be political policy (innit).

 

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Newswipe

British journalist, comic writer, broadcaster, kermudgen and all around ledge Charlie Brooker has been providing you with satirical giggles out of the spotlight of the mainstream since around the year 2000. He was writer on such classics as the Eleven O’Clock show and Brass Eye’s controversial paedophile special.

 

In 2006, the BBC gave him his own little show on BBC4 called Screenwipe, in which he gave viewers a snidey, synical and hilarious insight into how TV programmes are put together combined with commentary on trends and fads in TV land.

 

In 2009, Brooker spun Screenwipe off into Newswipe, a show of a similar format but incorporating newspaper coverage. Brooker has become a John Stewart for this side of the atlantic, taking poor journalism to task for failing the public and slamming politicians for exploiting the media, all the while drawing sniggers from the viewing public.

 

Each week begins with a Charlie’s analysis of a major news event from the week. The show cuts between clips of news coverage and Brooker sat on his sofa making snarky remarks. This sounds potentially awful, but Brooker’s charm and wit carry it off. 

 

This week’s big news story in Britain was the Chilcot inquiry and Brooker uses the Iraq tribunal to vent his spleen on all things political: the huge gulf in behaviour between politicians and ordinary people, the media’s fascination with ex-Prime Ministers (particularly the dull minutia of there lives), news organisations attempts to pre-empt what would be said during the inquiry and the law stopping Newswipe from showing any clips from the inquiry due to a law preventing broadcasters from using footage of the event for the purposes of satire or entertainment.

 

Brooker then tears apart a film made by Richard Maedely for the Daily Politics on BBC2, in which the former daytime TV presenter defends the actions of Tony Blair.

 

Then there is a brief history lesson that shows how TV has gone from pandering to politicians to being aggressive and eventually invasive with them.

 

It’s not all about Charlie though each week there his slot allocated for a geust theorist, academic, comedian or broadcaster. This week’s Newswipe featured a six and a half minute film by Adam Cutis, the man behind The Century of the Self. Curtis outlines how the Watergate scandal has led to an overenthusiasm in investigative journalism causing paranoia against the government which stimulated neo liberalism in the 1980s. This tendency towards overzealousness in journalistic fraternaties has driven the news to look for controversy where it does not exist, creating false epidemics as with swine flu, bird flu and BSE. As a result we are all paranoid and sceptical.

 

Another regular slot is the Week in Bullshit in which Brooker highlights exmples of overcoverage of non-news. This week he slams coverage of the Toyota’s recall and Jordan’s wedding.

 

This week also saw a piece by regular contributor, American comedian Doug Stanhope. Doug points out that media coverage rarely focuses on the contribution of overpopulation to global warming. Stanhope delivers his message through an angry white white trash alcohlic persona but his message is pure intellectualism. He points to an academic study that shows that a woman multiplies her carbon footprint by 40 times just by popping out a couple of sprogs. This of course is not the sort of thing other media outlets would tell you.

 

The main diference between this year’s Newswipe and last year’s Newswipe is the audience. Screenwipe and Newswipe have been popular among critics and media types but the show never really drew much outside attention due to its position on BBC4. The last year however has seen Charlie Brooker break out and become something of a minor celebrity. Brooker’s work with Channel 4 hasn’t hurt. He presented You Have Been watching at 10.30 on Tuesdays during the Summer and was a featured in the Big Fat Quiz of the Year alongside the likes of Russell Brand, Jonathon Ross and Jimmy Carr at Christmas. Twitter has helped too. Chuck has slipped snuggly into the London Twitteratti circuit since joining the social networking site, and has picked up a fairly large following. The international pulling power of Twitter has even seen the Huffington Post champion Newswipe.

 

With a growing national celebrity and international acclaim beginning to surround this show it can’t be too long before the beeb decides to bring Newswipe in from the digital wilderness. Don’t be surprised if the next series of wipes appear on BBC1.

 

That’s what I’ve been watching this week, now go away.

Saturday, February 6, 2010

Lost

Lost returned to our screens this week in typical what in the name of Jaysis is going on style.

 

RTE were generous enough to give an hour long retrospective of the first five series. Five series of bunkum and conundrums in one hour.

 

Large chunks of the story were missing and at least half of the significant characters were completely ignored. Anna Lucia, Mr Eko, Boone, Shannon, Rose, Bernard, Vincent, Libby, Michael, Walt, Penny and many others didn’t get a look in.

 

In all fairness, you’d need a week long recap if wanted to give any first time viewers a sporting chance of understanding what’s going on. It was just a very broad run through the backstory.

 

The recap posed questions that I don’t think the writers considered. How did Juliet learn to be a mechanic? How easy was it to convince Jack to go back to the island ? Locke just knew his Dad’s name - that’s what obituaries are for. How did Clare get onto a plane when she was 8 months pregnant? I thought  that was illegal. How chubby Jack in the first episode?

 

And that’s just the questions they didn’t want you to think about. Try factoring in all the puzzles that they want to pose.

 

This last series is strictly for those who’ve been suckered in for the last few years. Maybe you came in in the first series, maybe the second – but that’s the brink of fashionable tardiness. Don’t bother turning up to the party now.

 

After the recap we began the new season with a double episode.

 

We start with a flashback to the plane aaaaand... NO! Rose was in the tail end. She couldn’t have been sat next to Jack!!! And Sawyer’s hair is long again!! And Hurley’s facial hair is thick again!! They don’t know what they’re doing!

 

These were the first things that struck me. How could a show based on creating and solving mysteries in its viewers’ heads mess up basic continuity. This left me very very worried.

 

I managed to put these worries to the back of my head and get back into my usual state of optimism that the writers knew what they were doing. I switched my brain to the slow cycle and made the following obsevations: Kate still looks hot even after a nuclear explosion. They got rid of that 1977 bollix quick enough. The actor who plays Boone is back, no Shannon though. She’s was one of the main reasons I got into the first season. Sayid’s wounds are the first time Jack hasn’t bother trying to surgery someone back to life.

 

Reviews from the States had suggested that this first episode would be short on answers but there was one big one. The Smoke monster is the man in black who was doesn’t like Jacob. The guy in black also exposed himself as the new John Locke (with the original John Locke being more dead than I would have liked). This was a major answer in my book and filled the explaining stuff quota in one big swoop.

 

Of course, it does lead to the further questions of who is this dude and what was his beef with Jacob? Other questions that presented themselves over the course of the double episode were: What did Juliet mean by “It worked”? Why does Jin have all that money? When did Sun peak hotnesswise? I don’t think it was too long ago. If the bomb trick worked, why are they on the island aswell? Is Sayid dead or what?

 

A good few people died in this episode so that means that their stories don’t need to be resolved, but several also returned from the dead so don’t surprised if some them pop back up further down the line.

 

So we’re two hours into the last season and there are still a bunch of questions that don’t look like they will be resolved. How did the others get there? Why can’t women have kids on the island? Where’s Claire? What’s the deal with Christian? What’s the deal with Jacob? What’s that big statue about? Is it an island or something else? Why do people keep believing Ben?

 

I don’t really care about most of those things though. There’s only one answer I’m looking for. Who is Kate going to pick?